Our Love Affair with The Mount

Since the launch of the Save The Mount campaign in February 2008, The Mount has raised nearly $1.4 million dollars from over 2,100 individuals from across the country and abroad. Some of these donations were small, some were large; many were accompanied by notes of encouragement. Every single dollar sent in mattered. The outpouring of response from friends and supporters persuaded creditors to work with The Mount on a long-term restructuring agreement, the details of which will be announced soon.

Even under the threat of foreclosure, The Mount was able to open its doors to the public for the 2008 tourist season. Visitor attendance was strong despite rainy weather and the high price of gas. The Mount is buzzing yet again as it opens its doors for the 2009 season. Much is planned, including the continuation of the acclaimed lecture series and an exhibit examining the philanthropic and literary work of Edith Wharton during World War I. And while the future of The Mount is bright, the loyal help of its supporters is what makes it strong; The Mount would not be where it is right now without them.

If you’d like to help secure the future of The Mount, click here to contribute. 

Visit edithwharton.org for general information on The Mount. 

For our most recent look at this fascinating estate, see “Edith Wharton’s The Mount,” on page 54 of the July/August issue of Victoria magazine.

A Music Room
Lyrical & Poised

“However small and simple the music-room may be,” wrote Edith Wharton in 1897, “it should always appear as though there were space overhead for the notes to escape.” This splendid room—a harmonious mix of the intimate and the grand—strikes just the right chord. Part of a designer showhouse benefiting the restoration of the novelist’s nearby Lenox, Massachusetts, home, it lacks only musicians in tuxedos and ladies in taffeta and pearls.

Sprightliness of Composition

Before she ever wrote a novel, Edith Wharton was a self-appointed critic and reformer of interior design. A decorously savage Miss Manners of home decoration, she dismissed with an authoritative flick of her pen the heavy draperies and rampant bric-a-brackery of the Victoria era.

Though this music room, featured at last summer’s Edith Wharton Designer Showhouse, resounds with the elegant simplicity the author applauded, designer Florence Karasik did not set out to decorate according to her tastes. Instead, she began by imagining an affluent turn-of-the-century family who would live their lives in the space she created. As leisured New Englanders, she reasoned, they would certainly have done the Grand Tour of Europe and Asia, gathering trinkets and treasures along the way. Among the spoils she envisioned: the English Regency lady’s chair, made of lacquered and hand-gilded papier-mâché over wood, a graceful seat for a petite listener.

For the musicians—cello or viola players of every proportion—she rounded up sturdy Anglo-Raj-style ebony and rattan chairs, originally imported from Sri Lanka. Their filigreed backrests of curling leaves tilt away from the frame, a touch designed to accommodate not musicians, but rather diners stretching back after an elegant dinner.

The choice of dining chairs for a music room was intentional on Florence’s part. “I envisioned this as a house owned by musical people who would pull up dining chairs to entertain each other or a few friends,” she explains. To make the room comfortable for contemporary living, she included a sitting area filled with upholstered furniture.

Such a marriage of beauty and function would have pleased Edith Wharton. “Sprightliness of composition,” she noted in her 1897 Decoration of Houses, “should be combined with variety of detail, the decoration being neither so confused and intricate as to distract attention, nor so conventional as to be dismissed with a glance on entering the room.”

For our most recent look at this fascinating estate, see “Edith Wharton’s The Mount,” on page 54 of the July/August issue of Victoria magazine.

Looking for Edith
By Susan Minot

Edith Wharton is one of my literary heroes, and I have long traveled many places with her through her books. One summer day I decided to visit The Mount, her hilltop residence in Lenox, Massachusetts. She had been actively involved in creating both the house and the grounds. I came to see her stamp on the place, hoping to find a glimpse of Wharton the writer.

The first book Edith Wharton wrote—before The Age of Innocence and Ethan Frome, before The Custom of the Country and The House of Mirth—was The Decoration of Houses, co-written with architect Ogden Codman. It might have been titled The Declaration of Houses, so forcefully does it put forward classical principles of design. There are practical statements: “Doors should always swing into a room,” or “Pale tints should be avoided in the selection of carpets.” And more philosophical ones in which I hear Wharton’s ring: “Proportion is the good breeding of architecture,” and “The boudoir is the room in which small objects of art…show to the best advantage.” Wharton traveled widely to the great houses of Europe and in The Mount incorporated those elements of French, English, and Italian design she so admired. Raised in affluence and surrounded by what she felt was uniform materialism, Wharton brought a higher sensibility to architectural concerns, a kind of nobility. In her fiction one often encounters rooms and landscapes used as metaphors for her characters’ feelings and psyches.

It was a clear warm day when I arrived. The Mount, recently opened for the season, houses a theater group, Shakespeare & Company. When I pulled into the driveway, a young man told me to park by the stables. I walked down the driveway at the pace of a horse and buggy, taking the bends and dips, the house coming in and out of sight as I approached. Along the road were ferns, new and green; I knew Wharton had brought them from nearby Stockbridge. Inside the entryway, a couple of employees lingered by the cash register near the small bookshop. At one o’clock I was given a private tour (I was the only one there) by a young man in his twenties wearing a crisp shirt. We stood outside in the middle of the gravel courtyard surrounded by a high brick wall. Standing in the sun, my guide related some familiar facts of Wharton’s life: She was born in 1862 into the moneyed social world of New York, entered into a loveless marriage, and found literary success at age forty. Just before she and her husband divorced in 1913, Wharton sold the house and moved to Europe, a continent she felt was more sympathetic to her interests and where she lived until her death in 1937. A couple from New Orleans lived in the house for 23 years, and eventually it was sold to the Foxhollow School for Girls in 1942. Though the general structure of the building was never changed, fire escapes were put up, damaging the façade. Inside, original decorative objects such as vases and tapestries had long since disappeared. By the mid-seventies the house had been abandoned, its gutters rusted and pipes burst. In 1978 Shakespeare & Company rented it, and in 1980 the Edith Wharton Restoration project was created in a full-scale attempt to restore The Mount. So far, that effort has produced a new slate roof and a rebuilt cupola.

The façade, with the flat white elegance of European houses, was inspired by Belton House in England, a 1684 design thought to have been by Christopher Wren after an Italian villa. My guide pointed out that one of the arched shuttered windows was false, placed there for symmetry. I thought of the parallels between the false window and her writing—the balance of plots in her fiction and the illusion of art. Above the doorway, flanked by pillars, was a central arching window on the second floor where one could see through another window to trees and sky. But this, too, was a trick of the eye: A mirror inside reflected the window.

The front entrance had a low vaulted ceiling with cool terra-cotta floors and a niche where a scalloped fountain once held a statue of Pan playing his flute. The plaster panel inlays resembled water dripping down stones. “Like a grotto,” my guide explained. Here her guests would arrive—Henry James, Walter Berry, Beatrix Jones Farrand, her niece who’d helped with garden designs—sweeping up the stone staircase with the wrought-iron rail. Wharton had a great gift for friendship, and in her autobiography, A Backward Glance, she speaks more about others than about herself.

My guide assured me the color of the entry’s walls, a pistachio-blue trimmed with white molding, was the original, but I spotted a chipped area where the underlying hue was more subtle, faded with age perhaps. I pictured Wharton choosing this color; seeing her as a decorator added another dimension.

The upper gallery seemed least altered by the changes of 90 years, and I could easily visualize Wharton by the windows. She was not beautiful, but slight and graceful, and the reserve of her manners may have given her a brittle air, yet she had a good sense of humor and great sensitivity—a fact amply proven by the emotional complexity of her characters.

Privacy, Wharton believed, was “one of the first requisites of a civilized life,” and every room in the house, even the large drawing room, could be closed off. Privacy was particularly important to her. Without it, she could not write. The room she loved most was the library. We stood there surrounded by its built-in oak shelves. The carved panels were designed by her coauthor Codman, whom she could not afford to hire as an architect—Francis L.V. Hoppin took the job. One imagines Wharton an exacting and probably exasperating client. Henry James called The Mount “a monument to the almost too impeccable taste of its so accomplished mistress.” In the fireplace was an original cast-iron fireback portraying Hercules slaying the lion. Wharton, who had an opinion about everything, found scenes of violence most appropriate seen through flames.

A picture of Wharton I’ve often seen shows her sitting at a desk in the library, wearing a dress with lacy sleeves, bending forward from her narrow waist. But she did not write here. She wrote in bed, in the early morning, dropping sheets of paper to the floor as she finished them, to be gathered up by her secretary. She would finish by ten or eleven and then was free to take part in what she called “country cares and joys.” My guide pointed upward; above us was the bedroom. That was what I especially wanted to see.

Next door in the wide drawing room, I felt the first real intrusion of the present on the past. The theater company performed here now, and rows of folding chairs were set up. I glimpsed the ghosts of the fringed silk sofa, the circle of curving French armchairs, and the Aubusson rug.

I drifted out onto the terrace. The large green awning was gone, and in the sun I could see the terrace floor was chipped. Here Wharton had stood watching “the glowing summer weeks, and the woodland pageantry of our matchless New England autumn.” Amid the beautiful surroundings, she wrote her first novel, House of Mirth. An immediate best-seller, it allowed her to pay off The Mount’s loans. Looking out, I could see where the Lime Walk—rows of linden trees that made a pathway connecting the two main gardens—used to be. Now there was a lawn. Beyond, the grass was taller, blowing in the wind, and becoming wilder and wilder as it rolled off to Laurel Pond in the distance. The original view included Laurel Lake, even farther off, but woods had grown over the space.

Bringing culture and good company, Wharton’s visitors would go for motorcar rides and sit by the fire on winter afternoons. When I saw the dining room, I was reminded of her great appreciation for good conversation. She would seat her guests at a rather small table, with candles under little lamp shades. At her feet would be the striped pillows where her Pekingese slept—among them Miza, Mimi, and Toto—as beloved as children. They were buried on a shady hillock above the flower gardens.

A most important visitor was journalist Morton Fullerton, a friend of Henry James’s. Wharton was quite taken with him during a snowy ride in the country; later, in Paris, they began a love affair—the great one of her life. She was forty-seven years old and she was finally introduced to, as she put it, “what happy women feel.”

Visits were usually substantial, and guests brought a lot of luggage. A hydraulic elevator, a wire cage of sorts, ran parallel to the stairs in the servants’ quarters. My guide explained I was not allowed to look at the servants’ quarters. They were, I was told, now administrative offices.

Upstairs the tour came to a near halt. The doors were shut, and we stood looking down a dark hallway. My guide pointed to a door. It was where Henry James stayed. Could I see? No one was supposed to, my guide said; it was a dressing room for the theater company. A quick look? He seemed distressed. He put his ear reluctantly to the door and let me dart in. There were Sheetrock dividers and the kind of long tables used for bake sales. A few costumes and props were lying about. A narrow passageway led down steps to another door—my guide watched anxiously as I moved off. In this passageway Henry James had perhaps hung something on this hook. I felt that odd sense of being where a great person has been—what I’d been searching for. But I’d yet to find it with Wharton.

We were back in the hall. “Can I go down?” At the end of the hall, closed off, was her suite: bathroom, boudoir, and most particularly the bedroom where she wrote.

“No.” His tone was firm.

“Not just run down?”

He shook his head. Clearly this was more serious. I pestered him further and was told he’d have to check with his boss. When he returned he said to follow him—I would get to see the servants’ quarters!

The offices where we went to see his boss were little cubicles, rumpled and friendly. I was shown into a small room where a woman sat behind a desk talking on the phone. She indicated I should sit. I gazed at an enlarged picture of Wharton, appearing casual, her hair blurred-looking. She was a daunting figure, Edith Wharton. Besides being the greatest American woman writer at the beginning of the century, she was accomplished in language, travel, and knowledge of architecture. She managed to create this house, dress with elegance, and still see to the smallest detail, such as making sure her houseguests got the morning papers.

Eventually, the woman put down the phone. I explained my business and asked if there was some way I could see the bedroom. The woman shook her head.

“Really?”

“I’m sorry, no.”

“But—” I think I laughed.

She had very pale blue eyes, and they looked at me matter-of-factly. “Those rooms are used by the theater company.”

“I couldn’t look in?”

“They would be very upset.”

“I wouldn’t—make any noise…”

She sat immobile. I suggested the magazine piece might help the restoration project. She seemed to stir. I pressed on.

Finally she stood up, not happy. “I’ll see if anyone’s there. I can’t promise you—” I leapt after her.

Down the dim hall we went. She knocked on a door to the right. Silence. The door opened, and I was allowed into Edith Wharton’s bedroom. It was empty, except for a table or two, and full of light. Those were the corner windows through which Wharton looked out on her flower gardens and through which she had observed “the glory of their coloring actually vibrates in the sunlight.” I felt a thrill. I thought of the characters who had been born here “seemingly from nowhere.” She’d written of the process, “the character draws nearer, and seems to become aware of me, and feel the shy but desperate need to unfold his or her tale.” Sconces on the wall showed where her bed would have been, and my impression was so vivid I am not altogether sure now a bed wasn’t there.

After the tour I walked around the grounds. I’d felt a charge in her bedroom, but perhaps it had more to do with the triumph of getting inside. I knew her gardens were important to her. In them she became “lost in mazes of an inarticulate happiness.” News of phlox made her “mouth water,” and while living in Lenox she won many prizes in local flower shows. So involved had she become with her plants that she wrote a friend, “I am a better landscape gardener than novelist.” At one end of the lawn is where the principal flower garden had been, with a square fountain in the center surrounded by a tangle of white petunias. The eight gumdrop-shaped bushes long ago grew into trees, and now the garden is all leveled. I could see its outline.

I crossed the lawn below the split staircase through a stand of cedar trees, past the smell of orange blossoms, to the walled Italian garden. A gravel path and shallow stairs led down to the giardino segreto. Classically, this is a garden with no flowers and with more gravel than lawn, giving it “a charm independent of the seasons.” A pair of curled dolphins sat in the center of a dry fountain, and on one side stone pergola posts were bare of vines.

Walking back I passed under a lilac bush, really more of a tree with a twisting trunk and arching branches. I stood beneath its fat blossoms, which looked white from a distance but up close were a subtle shade of lilac. Suddenly it seemed as if this bush had been there in Wharton’s time. She may have walked under it. I held a flower and felt the stirring sensation. Edith Wharton was there.

For our most recent look at this fascinating estate, see “Edith Wharton’s The Mount,” on page 54 of the July/August issue of Victoria magazine.

The History of Edith Wharton’s Immense Library
By Molly McFall, Librarian, The Mount

When Edith Wharton died in 1937, having never had children, she left the bulk of her estate to a few relatives, friends, and her godsons. The largest amount of material, as well as the copyright to her books, was left to her friend Elisina Tyler. About one-third of her library went to Elisina’s son, who was one of Edith’s godchildren. The other portion of her books was bequeathed to another godson, Colin Clark, the son of art historian Kenneth Clark. This amounted to more than 4,000 volumes—approximately two-thirds of her original library.

When Colin was older, he was told that the books belonged to him, and he chose to sell them. Fortunately, he did not dismantle the library piecemeal, but sold the majority of his books to one bookseller in London. They later ended up in the hands of another English bookseller, who, in turn, sold them to The Mount in 2005.

Because the books that were left to the Tyler family were destroyed in World War II, the titles belonging to The Mount are essentially all that is left of Edith’s original library. We have fiction, poetry, literary criticism, history, philosophy, theology, and some science, as well as books on gardening and architecture. As Edith spoke many languages, a large proportion of these books are written in French, German, and Italian.

Most have handwritten bookplates or some other marker, such as her signature, an inscription, or annotations. These markings are of particular interest to Wharton scholars, as they enable them to see exactly what caught Edith’s eye as she was reading. She underlined passages, put exclamation marks in the margins, and sometimes made notes in the books. This, above all, is the reason that The Mount’s library is such an important part of Edith Wharton’s history. 

For our most recent look at this fascinating estate, see “Edith Wharton’s The Mount,” on page 54 of the July/August issue of Victoria magazine.

At Edith Wharton’s The Mount
A Scribe’s Sanctuary


When Edith Wharton created her Berkshires retreat, The Mount, she fulfilled her deepest wish of what a well-wrought life could be. Surrounded “by every loveliness of nature and every luxury of art,” as Henry James noted, she found peace in the early morning hours to write some of her finest novels, here in her bedroom. Its graceful spaces have been brought to light again, with furnishings and fabrics that recapture the time when Edith Wharton put her pen to paper and made her mark on the world.

By Catherine Calvert

Edith Wharton’s image of the revealing link between a woman and her surroundings comes from her own deepest source: From earliest childhood she was immensely aware of all that was about her. “My visual sensibility must always have been too keen for middling pleasures,” she said later; she claimed a “photographic memory” and a real sensitivity to the workings of atmosphere in a house. She remembered the brownstones of polite society as being stuffed “with smug and suffocating upholstery,” as choice an image as any she used in her later novels, where how a room is decorated is as much a revelation of character as any dialogue.

In her first house as a newly married woman, she began to simplify and clarify the old decorating habits, pushing away the knickknacks to bring light and air to the rooms of Pencraig Cottage in Newport. By the time she began renovating her New York town house, she had made a fast friendship with Ogden Codman, who collaborated with her on interiors that still seem fresh to our eyes, full of striped wallpaper and ornament that was restrained and classical. Theirs was a partnership so productive that the two then decided to write a guide to decorating. “Codman shared my dislike of these sumptuary excesses, and thought as I did that interior decoration should be simple and architectural; and finding that we had the same views we drifted, I hardly know how, toward the notion of putting them into a book.” Their book, The Decoration of Houses, is one hundred years old this year, and still seems prescient of modern ideas about harmony between interior decoration and architecture.

A re-created bedroom at The Mount conveys the spirit of her search for beauty in her surroundings. Though no photographs exist of the room as Edith Wharton designed it, its furniture pieces, colors, fabrics, and objects are similar to ones she was known to own and enjoy. She considered the fireplace the very focus of the room, and centered a clock on the mantelpiece always. This fine antique French timepiece recalls her love of all things Gallic and the many years she spent both living and traveling in France, filling up her memory, and her heart, with the beauties of the Continent.

The Mount was the place where she revealed all of what she’s learned in her journeys and reading, as she and her husband, Teddy, erected the 35-room house on a Massachusetts hillside, then filled the fields with gardens. In its graceful embrace, she was happy. After she left The Mount in 1911, she never lived in America again, but always cherished memories of golden days in this country. “The Mount was my first real home,” she wrote later, “and though it is nearly twenty years since I last saw it (for I was too happy there ever to want to revisit it as a stranger), its blessed influence still lives in me.”

“I have sometimes thought that a woman’s nature is like a great house full of rooms.”

For our most recent look at this fascinating estate, see “Edith Wharton’s The Mount,” on page 54 of the July/August issue of Victoria magazine.

Doing up The Mount

A team of talented designers was turned loose on Edith Wharton’s legendary home. What would the author of The Decoration of Houses have thought? Come for an exclusive first look. 

By Catherine Calvert

“The relation of proportion to decoration is like that of anatomy to sculpture: underneath are the everlasting laws.” –The Decoration of Houses

The Mount stands on its hill, gleaming white amid the green, elegant yet unassuming. It doesn’t look like the place for a revolution. And yet, when Edith Wharton built it five years after she wrote The Decoration of Houses and launched her writing career, her precepts of simplicity, proportion, and fitting details were radical—and fulfilled beautifully on this Berkshire hilltop. Once she wrote, “a woman’s nature is like a great house full of rooms,” and in these light-filled spaces full of calm classicism, she expressed her wish for harmony, peace, and seclusion. Mornings, she wrote in her bed, with its sweeping view of the smudged-blue hills beyond. At midday, she rose to inspect her beloved garden or join her guests. Only her closest friends were invited, like Henry James, who shared her intellectual interests and joined her in walks and drives. Evenings they read aloud together in the library or had animated conversations on the terrace, as the sun set pink and the fountains splashed. When, ten years on, she moved to Europe and sold The Mount, she could never bear to revisit, although, she wrote, “its blessed influence still lives in me.”

A century after she first stepped within, The Mount, now owned by a preservation group, is once again welcoming visitors. Two floors have been scrupulously restored, and to celebrate The Mount’s centennial (and make up for the fact that Edith Wharton’s original furnishings are long gone), seven designers were invited in to do up the rooms. “We didn’t ask them to look backward, to replicate turn-of-the-century styles,” says Stephanie Copeland, head of the Edith Wharton Restoration. “Instead, they were meant to think of what Edith Wharton herself might have done if she were decorating now.” In fact, she might well have welcomed their fresh takes on her traditions—this was, after all, the woman who swept away Victorian clutter, insisting that everything “confused and extravagant” give way before principles “based on common sense and regulated by the laws of harmony and proportion.” “Decorators still relate to her principles,” says Stephanie Copeland. “And it was eerie—though each worked independently; there is a similar palette, a similar spirit, throughout.”

The rooms will remain in place for several years as restoration continues; transformed by today’s vision, The Mount is still, as Henry James remarked, the place of “every loveliness of nature and every luxury of art.”

For our most recent look at this fascinating estate, see “Edith Wharton’s The Mount,” on page 54 of the July/August issue of Victoria magazine.

 

www.victoriamag.com